between the "yes buts" of some and the "no but" of others, although Belgium must go to the obvious: there is more room for negotiation. And therefore no solution. appreciation conciliator Vande Lanotte was inevitably a compromise. After so long, he had to lead to a document that takes into account the positions of each imperfectly. If everyone felt the same, there would obviously a government long ago. This, everyone knows and everyone knows that to get by, there is only one real issue: negotiate and accept that things are not quite the way we want.
Those who said "no, but" are clearly stigmatized, but their attitude is really different from those who said 'yes but'? Arguing that it needed amendments, clarifications, prerequisites, etc.. The speech is the same: "Our obsessions are not sufficiently present and they must be on! . In a compromise, they do make a text that resembles them, and thus where others find themselves less and less. How could we have any solution in the end? Some argue
now a change of partners and methods. Hopefully this leads to a better situation when we know that the positions are even more entrenched in so-called partners.
short, is there other than the impasse? The Lion, threatening growls and a cock, proud, sing! If only we could still drink a whole Gueuze!
0 comments:
Post a Comment